Leadership Engagement Bootcamp: Exercise 1: Understand Your Leader’s Style

Posted June 09, 2016 by Josh Grant

QI Tips Understanding Leaderships Style
Understanding how to approach senior leadership leads to high engagement with QI work. 

This is one of a series of posts based on the “Engaging Senior Leadership in Your Quality Improvement (QI) Work” webinar.

“Follow the Leader” isn’t always a game that should be played during quality improvement (QI) work. In fact, often, QI teams need to be proactive about engaging their leaders, creating a partnership to support change initiatives. To do that, leaders might have to be pushed out of their comfort zones.

“Most people don’t naturally embrace change, and that includes leaders,” says NICHQ’s Director of Programs Meghan Johnson, MSc. “About 70 percent of change programs fail. Change efforts in healthcare are no more likely to succeed than they are in other fields. However, leadership engagement is one of the key predictors and a correlate of success.”

To generate buy-in for change, one needs to understand their leader’s motivation and desire for the specific type of change targeted by the QI work.

The Right Motivation

Because every leader has unique motivators for promoting and participating in any initiative, one should learn about their leader’s personality. Some questions to ask include:

  • What is the leader’s personality type? (e.g., sociable, precise, competitive)
  • How does the leader respond to information? (e.g., enthusiastically, cautiously)
  • What convinces this person? (e.g., numbers, stories)
  • What do they respond most to? (e.g., data, innovation, trends)
This information will steer the QI team towards the right tools and approaches to use when discussing a project. For instance, an analytical leader would probably be more motivated by data than anything else, so search for statistics that support the change effort. On the other hand, a more cautious leader might require a full picture of expected and unintended outcomes in order to feel comfortable before moving forward.

Even in cases when leaders are supportive and enthusiastic, the right tools and proper framing of the work can lead to higher engagement, which can result in a successful, long-term change.

The Desire for Change
Graph
Rogers' diffusion of innovation curve
“The second thing when thinking about your leader’s style is to understand their appetite for change,” according to Johnson.

She used Everett Rogers’ diffusion of innovation curve to highlight the five groups leaders will likely fall into. Understanding a leader’s attitude will also unveil some potential solutions for approaching them about change and QI work:
  • Innovators – This is a small minority who wants to expand into new horizons. For innovators to be engaged, the proposed idea and strategy for implementation need to have positive expected results and be unlike previous work done within the organization. 
  • Early Adopters – A slightly larger group who are more likely to support change when it aligns with the organization’s overall goals. Where innovators encourage and welcome new ideas to evolve current operations, early adopters are more judicious in what they support. To approach them, QI teams should create connections between QI and how it’ll benefit everyone within the organization in both the short and long terms.
  • Early Majority –This large group will follow change that yields positive results, but aren’t usually champions for innovation. Instead, leaders in this category wait to see some results before opting to change. In this case, teams need to show evidence of past success to engage their leaders. 
  • Late Majority – A group who is more skeptical and resistant to change, and needs to see that there’s already support for change within the organization and across the field as a whole. With late-majority leaders, change needs to have momentum from key decision makers and be popular with other organizations in the same industry. Late-majority leaders are cautious, but ultimately don’t want to fall too far behind their peers. 
  • Laggards – This is a small minority, because most leaders aren’t laggards who value past success and traditional methods over change. To convince laggards to buy-in to change, ideas should be tied to previous work to demonstrate similarities between them and highlight potential progress. 
As with leadership’s personality, measuring and understanding the current attitude towards change will affect each change initiative. There will never be a universal method of gaining engagement and buy-in, and understanding a leader’s personality is only the start of developing the appropriate approach

Share:

Add your comment

 
 

 

Archive

Tagcloud

quality improvement tips QI PDSA cycle baby box safe sleep nichq infant mortality family engagement eccs coiin immunizations health equity health disparities accreditation im coiin astho onboarding collaboration engagement partnerships larc nashp breastfeeding new york wic new york state hospitals mom mother partners epilepsy data AAP early childhood pdsas texas community support learning session children's health new technology engineering transgender collaborative learning planning PDSA planning paralysis underplanning analysis paralysis vision eye health smoking smoke-free housing second-hand smoke toolkit e-module infant health dental care oral health underserved populations health inequity public health Maternal and Child Health Journal leadership engagement Sickle cell disease indiana SCD medicaid perinatal regionalization sudden infant death syndrome national birth defects prevention month birth defects pregnancy planning one key question prepregnancy health preconception health public breastfeeding support families patients experts insights CHOPT childhood obesity innovation food desert telemedicine TBLC breastfeeding supporting preterm birth prematurity racial disparities audiology ehdi follow-up illinois talana hughes vulnerable populations sports asthma soccer basketball obesity football SIDS Pokemon Go gamification smartphones interconception care birth spacing issue brief contraceptive use postpartum care CoIN HRSA early childhood trauma NHSA community health consumer advocacy womens health interconception health teenage health PATCH wisconsin missouri risk appropriate care community health workers SCD< infographic infant mortality awareness month inspirations childrens health national breastfeeding month maternal health patient engagement hearing loss hearing treatment pediatric vision vision screening eyesight pre-term birth early-term birth SCD clinic los angeles LOCATe CDC levels of care neonatal care maternal care smoking cessation project safe sleep practices neonatal abstinence syndrome NAS opioids maternal and child health MCH Family voices quality care mental health hydroxyurea SCDTDP men dads testing change data sharing state government city government apps sleep AJPM preconception care senior leadership breastfeeding support video series access BQIH exclusive breastfeeding long-acting reversible contraception unplanned pregnancies social determinants of health health innovations Best Babies Zone CoIIN baby boxes Rhode Island progesterone rooming-in Baby-Friendly parent partner patient and family engagement healthy weight healthy lifestyles primary care telementoring ECHO video conferencing socioemotional health childhood development pediatric Tennessee interview National Coordinating and Evaluation Center medical-legal partnerships mobile app disparities perinatal care overweight obese healthy weight clinic wellness pilot sites data collection education resources paternal engagement risk-appropriate care preterm infants high-risk babies Ten Steps public relations social movement reversible contraceptives medical home pediatric medical home patient transformation facilitator PTF skin-to-skin rooming in prenatal smoking information visualization charts SUID postpartum new mother webinar AMCHP QI Tips ongoing improvement fourth trimester partnership quality and safety coaching leadership support year end holiday message reflections gratitute Medicaid data doctor relationship PQC perinatal quality collaboratives vision care vision health evidence-based guidelines ASH health and wellness healthy living healthy eating home visitors home visiting programs March of Dimes APHA results evaluation supplementation formula reduction video infant loss social media advocacy leadership Berns Best Fed Beginnings Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding sustainability stress prenatal care data capacity epidemiologists surveillance data PFAC community partners preconception and interconception care motivational interviewing Native Americans ADHD NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scale ADHD Toolkit system design care coordination skin to skin newborn screening reduce smoking aim statement safe birth Texas Ten Step skin-to-skin contact 10 Steps staff training small tests acute care mother-baby couplet collective impact population health preconception Newborn Screening Program substance abuse breast milk formula milk bank crisis first responders NYC improvement healthcare health system sickle cell diease treatment protocol family health partner maternity care Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network Health Outcomes Cross-Sector Collaboration Knowledge Sharing Child Health